By Maryam Henein, Investigative Journalist
Continuing from Part 1…
Lies Upon Lies
“I never worked with LIVE SARS-like coronaviruses,” Hu, stated. He is the assistant researcher to Zhengli Shi.
Hu was fibbing.
It was far back as 2005 that the WIV laboratory first identified a novel coronavirus similar to the SARS virus in Chinese bats, and named it SARS-like coronavirus (SARS-like coronavirus or SARS-related coronavirus), confirming that bats are the natural reservoir host of a class of coronaviruses related to SARS virus.
In 2017, Hu wrote:
“In addition to epidemiological investigation and sequence analysis, we also conducted cellular infection experiments to investigate the potential cross-species transmission ability of the newly discovered SARS-like coronavirus in bats.”
His name also appears on several papers such as one titled Isolation of ACE2-dependent and -independent sarbecoviruses from Chinese horseshoe bats.
In 2013, the WIV collected animal samples from which they identified
the bat coronavirus RaTG13, which is 96.2 percent similar to the COVID-19 virus.By 2018, the WIV had sequenced almost all of RaTG13, which is the second closest known whole genome match to SARS-CoV-2, after BANAL-52, which is 96.8 percent similar. The claim is that neither of these viruses is close enough to SARS-CoV-2 to be a direct progenitor.
The evidence shows that the SARS-CoV2 very well could be a laboratory product created by using bat coronaviruses ZC45, and/or ZXC2 as a template and backbone, wrote Chinese virologist Dr. Li-Meng Yan.
“Of course, it was not an accident,” Yan said.
Incidentally, the WIV probably maintains one of the world’s largest repositories of bat samples, which has enabled its coronavirus research and related public health support.
“The information available to the IC indicates that the WIV first possessed SARS-CoV-2 in late December 2019, when WIV researchers isolated and identified the virus from samples from patients diagnosed with pneumonia of unknown causes.”
According to the White Coat Waste Project, a nonprofit that opposes taxpayer-funded research on animals, much of Hu’s research focused on modifying coronaviruses so they could bind to human cells.
“Agency stonewalling and reporting loopholes made it incredibly challenging to follow the money from government agencies to the Wuhan lab, but the documents make it clear that U.S. taxpayer money funded some of Hu’s experiments,” said Anthony Bellotti, the founder, and president of the White Coat Waste Project.
The stated purpose of the research was to identify viruses that could lead to a pandemic and facilitate the development of a vaccine. Critics say that such research requires stringent precautions because they can make the viruses in the lab more infectious for humans. No question. They are gaining the function to make a ‘virus’ more deadly in the name of safety and supposed science.
Chyna Supposed Cover Up
The mainstream media and government blame the Chinese government, hinting that they attempted to cover up the truth from the world. However, China is hardly the only government on the hook. The lab leak theory does not have unilaterally anti-Chinese implications. The United States is guilty. And other countries are too. This plandemic has arguable beginnings as far back as 2003 when SARS-CoV1 was isolated.
Why is it that when the Chinese CCP experiments with ‘viruses’ it’s a bioweapon but when our government experiments with ‘viruses’ it’s dubbed “pandemic preparedness?”
And consider that on the one hand, WIV worked with the U.S. government and on the other hand with the Chinese military People’s Liberation Army PLA (on vaccines and other therapeutics related to coronaviruses).
Dr. Yusen, the former director of the PLA’s AMMS Laboratory of Pathogen and Biosecurity at the Beijing Institute of Microbiology and Epidemiology, filed the world’s first patent application for a COVID-19 vaccine in China on February 24, 2020, just a month after the country acknowledged human-to-human transmission. Yusen is dead after falling from the roof of the WIV within three months of filing the patent.
This discovery raised suspicions that the Chinese military may have been working on a vaccine even before officially notifying the World Health Organization about the outbreak.
Meanwhile, what were the military games, officially known as the 7th CISM Military World Games, on October 18, 2019, really all about?
Just on June 29, it was reported that WIV researcher Chao Shao revealed China deliberately engineered the coronavirus virus as a “bioweapon,” and that his colleagues were tasked with identifying the most effective strain for spreading among various species, including people. (Was Shao helping with the ‘it’s all Chyna’s fault’ storyline?).
Chao Shao also made sure to mention that several of his colleagues went missing during the 2019 Military World Games held in Wuhan.
According to him, one of the missing individuals revealed that they were sent to hotels accommodating athletes from different countries to “check the health or hygiene conditions.” Chao Shao suspected that these actions were unrelated to virology research and suggested that they were potentially involved in spreading the virus.
While critics blame the Chinese government some China officials have blamed the American military as having brought the virus to Wuhan, also calling it a ‘bioweapon.’ The influential Communist Party mouthpiece Global Times accused the US of gross inefficiency in handling its own virus problem.
In the psychological operations playbook, this would be what is dubbed a big lie: The repeated articulation of a complex of events that justify subsequent action. The descriptions of these events have elements of truth, and the “big lie” generalizations merge and eventually supplant the public’s accurate perception of the underlying events.
Make no mistakes globalists know no borders.
The lab leak involves research paid for by US tax dollars. Fact. And Anthony Fauci, the Plandemic Impresario tasked with leading the US response to COVID-19, was in charge of the government agency that gave Hu the gain-of-function research.
In regards to the GOF research that has been renamed “Directed Evolution,” the Obama administration paused federal funding of gain-of-function research in 2014. But not really. There was an escape hatch for Ralph Baric and Peter Dazcak. Exceptions were made for gain-of-function research deemed “vital to government scientists.”
In November 2022, during a seven-hour deposition admitting that exceptions had been made for gain-of-function research deemed vital to government scientists. Watch my clip on Twitter.
In any case, the pause ended in 2017.
On January 9th, 2017, at 9:06 a.m., (days before Trump’s inauguration) John Holdren’s Office of Science and Technology Policy wrote on Obama’s White House website:
“Today, the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) is releasing ‘Recommended Policy Guidance for Departmental Development of Review Mechanisms for Potential Pandemic Pathogen Care and Oversight (P3CO).’ Adoption of these recommendations will satisfy the requirements for lifting the current moratorium on certain life sciences research that could enhance a pathogen’s virulence and/or transmissibility to produce a potential pandemic pathogen (an enhanced PPP).”
A year later, Ecohealth Alliance, with the help of DARPA and their humanized mice, created a new coronavirus that became known as WiV1.
Word Wizardry & Half Truths To Mess With Nature
The IC report assessed that “some scientists at the WIV have genetically engineered coronaviruses using “common laboratory practices.”
WIV scientists have created chimeras, or combinations, of SARS-like coronaviruses through genetic engineering, attempted to clone other unrelated infectious viruses, and used reverse genetic cloning techniques on SARS-like coronaviruses.
The IC has no information, however, indicating that any WIV genetic engineering work has involved SARS-CoV-2, a close progenitor, or a backbone virus that is closely related enough to have been the source of the pandemic.
Regardless, does this scientism sound like common laboratory practices to you??? GMO viruses? Is that why the spike protein has strange inserts?
As of January 2019, WIV researchers performed SARS-like coronavirus experiments in BSL-2 laboratories, despite acknowledgments going
back to 2017 that this virus has the ability to directly infect humans through their spike protein and early 2019 warnings of the danger of this practice. Separately, the WIV’s plan to conduct an analysis of potential epidemic viruses from pangolin samples in the fall of 2019, suggests the researchers sought to isolate live viruses.
Ventilation & Viruses
An inspection of the WIV’s high-containment laboratories in
2020—only months after the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak’s emergence— identified a need to update aging equipment, a need for additional disinfectant equipment, and improvements to ventilation systems. As this inspection occurred in the midst of the WIV’s crisis response to the COVID-19 outbreak, these findings are not necessarily indicative of WIV’s biosafety status prior to the outbreak.
To translate, some safety issues like poor ventilation could have caused this outbreak.
Meanwhile, numerous authorities, including the U.S. Embassy in Beijing, raised concerns about negligence at the Wuhan lab over the years. Vanity Fair (of all rags) and ProPublica described the lab as a “bio-complex in crisis.”
To further muddy the waters, the mainstream media and not-so-obvious establishment suggested this lab leak was an accident – a result of substandard safety protocols at the Wuhan lab that unleashed a killer pathogen on the rest of the planet. But that is not the end of the story.
Was this a way to shift blame? To divert attention? An attempt to communicate that this was in no way an intentionally released bioweapon?
First, it was a wet market. Then a possible accident in a lab but nothing was intentional. Then there was confusion and finger-pointing. Do you see how this works? They edge you toward the truth with supposed reveals but never give you 100 percent truth no matter what.
Based on three years of research, I do not think this was an innocent gaffe.
Why did Fauci try to conceal his involvement? According to a recent press release, he tried to publicly suppress the lab leak theory because “Tony d[idn’t] want his fingerprints on origin stories,” according to a press release by the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic. But they are everywhere.
The Covid Origins Saga has eroded trust big time. Many of us were punished for asking questions. Do they think we’re going to just forget? How can we recover as a nation?
In my opinion, the powers that be are co-opting the narrative as they regroup and have a post-mortem huddle while forking over intentional vagueness. What was DARPA’s role in all of this?
“As more and more people begin to realize that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are not what they were represented to be by our national and international healthcare “experts,” looking back at the origins of the pandemic takes on a critical patina,” As Doc Malibu writes in his Substack.
Will we find out the truth before the next pandemic? Because it is coming. It’s just a matter of time. The Overlords have warned us. And as Bill Gates warned, “The next one will get our attention.”
Stay Tuned. On July 11 at 10 am, the Select Subcommittee is holding a hearing about the Origins.
Like what you’re reading on The Tenpenny Report? Share this article with your friends. Help us grow.
Get more of Dr. Tenpenny’s voice of reason at her website.
Join our list here
Maryam Henein is an investigative journalist, and founder, and editor-in-chief of the health magazine and marketplace HoneyColony. She is also a functional medicine consultant/coach, and the director of the award-winning documentary film Vanishing of the Bees, narrated by Elliot Page. Follow her on Twitter @maryamhenein. Email her: email@example.com.
Your Donation Helps Us Fight Censorship And Remain Ad-Free
Help Us Fight
Make this donation every dayweekmonthquarteryear
Select Payment Method
Credit Card Info
This is a secure SSL encrypted payment.
Cardholder Name *
Acceptance of any contribution, gift or grant is at the discretion of the Vaxxter. The Vaxxter will not accept any gift unless it can be used or expended consistently with the educational purpose and mission of the Vaxxter.
No irrevocable gift, whether outright or life-income in character, will be accepted if under any reasonable set of circumstances the gift would jeopardize the donor’s financial security.
General donations to Vaxxter are not tax-deductible. If you are interested in contributing a minimum amount of $5000 or more to our 501C3 donation, please contact us directly.
The Vaxxter will only accept donations of cash. Certain other gifts, real property, personal property, in-kind gifts, non-liquid securities, and contributions whose sources are not transparent or whose use is restricted in some manner, must be reviewed prior to acceptance due to the special obligations raised or liabilities they may pose for Vaxxter and will not be accepted.
The Vaxxter will respect anonymous gifts, the Vaxxter will restrict information about the donor to only those staff members with a need to know.
The Vaxxter will not compensate, whether through commissions, finders’ fees, or other means, any third party for directing a gift or a donor to the Vaxxter.
Terms of donation
If you prefer snail mail instead, make donation checks payable to
CHOONADI, LLC, owner of Vaxxter.com
7380 Engle Road
Middleburgh Hgts, OH 44130