Accelerated cancer: an emerging catastrophe
Several medical specialists are speaking out about the increase in cancer diagnoses after vaccination, especially recurrences in patients previously in remission, and new, unusual and especially rapid cases, called “turbo cancers”, for example in this article about swedish the observations of the pathologist Dr. Ute Kruger and the threats after his career.
Another outspoken pathologist, Dr Ryan Cole, was one of the first to spot the accelerated rates of cancer seen since the launch of the Covid-19 vaccine. In this interview, he explains the mechanisms of immune dysfunction believed to be responsible.
Pathologists are considered the “quality controllers of medicine” as they tend to detect patterns of disease in populations early. Dr. Cole refers to this paper by Föhse et al, BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 reprograms adaptive and innate immune responses, which is an analysis of the immune response in Comirnaty that provides insights into the mechanisms that explain why accelerated cancers may occur at higher rates in populations inoculated by Covid-19. He reports that oncologists around the world are now talking about rising rates of normally manageable cancers that are occurring like wildfire and are more aggressive than usual.
Professor Emeritus Masanori Fukushima of Kyoto University in Japan referenced immune dysregulation in his recent warning of a pending global health disaster. A few days ago, an online search provided information about Professor Fukushima’s background (biochemistry, clinical medicine, oncology and medical education). Today this information is obscured by the results concerning a 16th century warrior, which may not be entirely irrelevant.
We no longer wonder about the motivations of search engines and “fact-checking” services. It is obvious that their role is to silence anyone who does not “protect the vaccine”.
The UK’s General Medical Council, following the tactics of the Federation of State Medical Boards, is prosecuting oncologists Professor Justin Stebbing of Imperial College London and Professor Karol Sikora of the University’s School of Medicine of Buckingham, in a case that reeks of corruption and intimidation of the pharmaceutical industry. Professor Sikora has been steadfast in his predictions that the response to the pandemic would lead to accelerated cancers, but due to delayed detection and diagnosis, as well as disruptions in access to treatment.
Professor Sikora’s recent paper, The confinement cancer wave has only just begun, is a testament to the acceleration of cancers now being seen in the UK. He is also campaigning against the ongoing closure of four world-class cancer centres, in line with Dr Bob Gill’s conclusion that the National Health Service is being deliberately brought down by the for-profit pharmaceutical industrial complex.
Another professor of oncology, Angus Dalgleish of St George’s at the University of London, has written to the editor-in-chief of the British Medical Journal, expressing concern about immune suppression causing rare and accelerated cancers. It calls for an end to the vaccine program “given that the average age of death from Covid in the UK is 82 and from all other causes is 81 and falling”, before describing several adverse events, including cancers related to the immune system.
One of Europe’s best-known figures in medical research is Dr. Michel Goldman, professor of immunology and pharmacotherapy at the Université Libre de Bruxelles in Belgium. Dr. Goldman has gone public with his own personal story of an accelerated cancer he associates with the Covid-19 “vaccination”. He was diagnosed with T-cell lymphoma, a cancer of the immune system, sometime after receiving his second Covid-19 inoculation. Immediately after diagnosis she rushed to get a third inoculation, believing it was indicated due to the immune suppression caused by her cancer.
A few days after the administration of this injection, Dr. Goldman’s condition worsened and tests showed a rapid proliferation of the cancer. He and his brother, a nuclear medicine specialist, have written a case study that encourages further medical research into the suspected connection between mRNA “vaccines” and T-cell lymphoma. Read more here and listen his story here.
Despite the introduction of a new pharmaceutical product to the market in hasty circumstances with numerous manufacturing concerns, Pfizer “assumed” that there was no need to look for possible carcinogenic effects. Those who received the product for whatever reason, along a wide spectrum between belief in the “safe and effective” narrative and devious coercion, are indeed experimental subjects. Pfizer’s non-clinical overview trial document published in March 2022 states the following.
Medsafe Comirnaty (Pfizer) New Zealand data sheet says the same.
Accessed via OIA request, email dated 21 September 2021 from Dr Tim Hanlon of the MOH Post-Events Group, Covid-19 Vaccination and Immunization Programme, responding to the Chief Coroner Deputy Tutton who had requested more information for coroners making decisions related to the autopsy. the examination of dead persons after the administration of the Comirnaty, stated the following. What possible evidence could Dr. Hanlon be referring to?
And note especially the last two sentences. Are you sure you mean SADS? And why has the Chief Coroner ignored our letter about cases exactly like these to which Dr. Hanlon refers?
Meanwhile, many responsible for implementing what the eminent pathologist Dr. Described by Roger Hodkinson as the most heinous crime against humanity, they continue to blame their crimes on a virus with a death rate from infection in the same range as the seasonal flu. It is also pertinent to note that a recent meta-analysis shows that IFR is even less of a risk in those who are unvaccinated between the ages of 0 and 59 than previously thought (0.035%).
However, official messages seek to blame every other aspect of the pandemic except the jab for its terrible damage.
The potential consequences of imposing these substances on unwitting and fearful populations were known. Concerned scientists and medical professionals such as NZDSOS have repeatedly drawn attention to potential harm and asked why precautions have not been taken for a disease with a similar death rate to influenza.
With regard to cancer in particular, studies appeared in early 2020 predicting that the C-19 spike protein would turn off vital cancer-protective genes, particularly the P53 and BRCA genes. Here is a review of some studies on this topic. This laboratory study created a particular stir for finding spike protein abundant in cell nuclei, and then for its downright suspicious retraction, discussed in this fascinating paper by computational biologist Dr. Jessica Rose, here.
The ramifications of willful blindness to these injections are becoming glaringly obvious. Accelerating rates of cancer are among many concerns. Pharma and regulators were warned, refused to participate in the scientific process, and participated in the silencing of dissent, to the detriment of us all.
The resolution of this crisis must include identifying those who coordinated this atrocity and ensuring that they face justice. Safeguards must also be put in place to ensure that corporate, politicized, nefarious and criminal interests can never again abrogate human rights, medical science and clinical practice.